2008 BMW X5 vs. 1973 Volkswagen 1600
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Volkswagen 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Volkswagen 1600 would be higher. At 4,619 cc, 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 1145 kg more than 1973 Volkswagen 1600.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1973 Volkswagen 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (480 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 370 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Volkswagen 1600. (110 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Volkswagen 1600.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 1973 Volkswagen 1600 | |
Make | BMW | Volkswagen |
Model | X5 | 1600 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4619 cc | 1584 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 480 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 85.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 69 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2340 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 40 L |