2008 BMW X5 vs. 1976 Datsun 260Z
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Datsun 260Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Datsun 260Z would be higher. At 4,398 cc, 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1976 Datsun 260Z.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Datsun 260Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (440 Nm @ 5400 RPM) has 227 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Datsun 260Z. (213 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Datsun 260Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 BMW X5 | 1976 Datsun 260Z | |
| Make | BMW | Datsun |
| Model | X5 | 260Z |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1976 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2565 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 213 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 92.1 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 8.1 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4135 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 60 L |
