2008 BMW X5 vs. 1977 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 4,398 cc, 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW X5 (328 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1977 Mazda RX-3. (100 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda RX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 1339 kg more than 1977 Mazda RX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (440 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 305 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 1977 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | X5 | RX-3 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1977 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 328 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 440 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2191 kg | 852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 65 L |