2008 BMW X5 vs. 1982 ZIL 4104
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 ZIL 4104. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 ZIL 4104 would be higher. At 7,695 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 ZIL 4104 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 ZIL 4104 weights approximately 1155 kg more than 2008 BMW X5.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 ZIL 4104. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 ZIL 4104 (608 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW X5. (480 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1982 ZIL 4104 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 BMW X5 | 1982 ZIL 4104 | |
| Make | BMW | ZIL |
| Model | X5 | 4104 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4619 cc | 7695 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 311 HP |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 608 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 108 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 105 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 3335 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3340 mm |
