2008 BMW X5 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW X5 (228 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 BMW X5 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | BMW | Caterham |
| Model | X5 | 1700 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 228 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Top Speed | 210 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 36 L |
