2008 BMW X5 vs. 1986 Caterham 1700
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Caterham 1700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Caterham 1700 would be higher. At 4,799 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW X5 (351 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1986 Caterham 1700. (168 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1986 Caterham 1700.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Caterham 1700. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 BMW X5 has automatic transmission and 1986 Caterham 1700 has manual transmission. 1986 Caterham 1700 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 BMW X5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 BMW X5 | 1986 Caterham 1700 | |
| Make | BMW | Caterham |
| Model | X5 | 1700 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4799 cc | 1692 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 351 HP | 168 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Top Speed | 246 km/hour | 188 km/hour |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 3390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 1050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 36 L |
