2008 BMW X5 vs. 1995 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 4,398 cc, 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW X5 (328 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1995 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1995 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 391 kg more than 1995 Mercury Villager. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 BMW X5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 BMW X5 | 1995 Mercury Villager | |
| Make | BMW | Mercury |
| Model | X5 | Villager |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
| Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 2960 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2191 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2860 mm |
