2008 BMW X5 vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 4,619 cc, 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 515 kg more than 2002 Jaguar XJR.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Jaguar XJR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW X5. (480 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 2002 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | X5 | XJR |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4619 cc | 4196 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
Torque | 480 Nm | 525 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 90.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.5 seconds | 5.9 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 12.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 85 L |