2008 BMW X5 vs. 2002 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Rover 75 would be higher. At 4,619 cc, 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 780 kg more than 2002 Rover 75.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Rover 75. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (480 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 265 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Rover 75. (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Rover 75. 2008 BMW X5 has automatic transmission and 2002 Rover 75 has manual transmission. 2002 Rover 75 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 BMW X5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 2002 Rover 75 | |
Make | BMW | Rover |
Model | X5 | 75 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4619 cc | 1795 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 480 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 89.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1400 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 64 L |