2008 BMW X5 vs. 2003 Chrysler Pacifica
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Chrysler Pacifica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Chrysler Pacifica would be higher. At 4,619 cc, 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 15 kg more than 2003 Chrysler Pacifica.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (480 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Chrysler Pacifica. (339 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Chrysler Pacifica.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 2003 Chrysler Pacifica | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | X5 | Pacifica |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4619 cc | 3518 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 253 HP |
Torque | 480 Nm | 339 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.9:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 2165 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 11.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 87 L |