2008 BMW X5 vs. 2004 Chrysler Sebring
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 4,619 cc, 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 695 kg more than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (480 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chrysler Sebring. (258 Nm). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 2004 Chrysler Sebring | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | X5 | Sebring |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4619 cc | 2737 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 201 HP |
Torque | 480 Nm | 258 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.9:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 61 L |