2008 BMW X5 vs. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (239 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2008 BMW X5. (228 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2008 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 179 kg more than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (481 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer. (382 Nm). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mercury Mountaineer.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 2004 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | BMW | Mercury |
Model | X5 | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 239 HP |
Torque | 481 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2099 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 85 L |