2008 BMW X5 vs. 2005 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 450 kg more than 2005 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW X5. (480 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2005 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 2005 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | X5 | CTS |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4619 cc | 5663 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 395 HP |
Torque | 480 Nm | 536 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.5 seconds | 4.7 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 68 L |