2008 BMW X5 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 4,619 cc, 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 611 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (480 Nm) has 182 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Malibu. (298 Nm). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 2005 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | X5 | Malibu |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4619 cc | 3491 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Torque | 480 Nm | 298 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1569 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 61 L |