2008 BMW X5 vs. 2006 Cadillac XLR
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Cadillac XLR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Cadillac XLR would be higher. At 4,572 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac XLR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 535 kg more than 2006 Cadillac XLR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (440 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Cadillac XLR. (420 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Cadillac XLR.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 2006 Cadillac XLR | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | X5 | XLR |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4572 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 320 HP |
Torque | 440 Nm | 420 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 92 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82.7 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Top Speed | 240 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.7 seconds | 5.9 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2191 kg | 1656 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 68 L |