2008 BMW X5 vs. 2006 Ford E-250
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 4,619 cc, 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 960 kg more than 2006 Ford E-250.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Ford E-250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (480 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford E-250. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 BMW X5 | 2006 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | X5 | E-250 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4619 cc | 4605 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 226 HP |
| Torque | 480 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1220 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 2020 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 132 L |
