2008 BMW X5 vs. 2006 Lincoln Zephyr
To start off, 2008 BMW X5 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Lincoln Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Lincoln Zephyr would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 BMW X5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Zephyr, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (300 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Lincoln Zephyr. (271 Nm @ 4750 RPM). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Lincoln Zephyr. 2006 Lincoln Zephyr has automatic transmission and 2008 BMW X5 has manual transmission. 2008 BMW X5 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Lincoln Zephyr will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 2006 Lincoln Zephyr | |
Make | BMW | Lincoln |
Model | X5 | Zephyr |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2977 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 218 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 271 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.2:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 66 L |