2008 BMW X5 vs. 2008 Jeep Commander
To start off, both 2008 BMW X5 and 2008 Jeep Commander were released in the same year (2008). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,799 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Commander weights approximately 210 kg more than 2008 BMW X5.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW X5. (475 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 2008 Jeep Commander | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | X5 | Commander |
Year Released | 2008 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4799 cc | 2987 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 475 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 2410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1770 mm | 2270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2940 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |