2008 BMW X5 vs. 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 BMW X5 would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 914 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (542 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW X5. (480 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 2009 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | X5 | TrailBlazer |
Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4619 cc | 5999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 390 HP |
Torque | 480 Nm | 542 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1266 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 83 L |