2008 BMW X5 vs. 2009 Ford E-150
To start off, 2009 Ford E-150 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 1219 kg more than 2009 Ford E-150.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (440 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford E-150. (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 2009 Ford E-150 | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | X5 | E-150 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 4605 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 225 HP |
Torque | 440 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2191 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 132 L |