2008 BMW X5 vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 BMW X5 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 32 more horse power than 2008 BMW X5. (328 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2008 BMW X5.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (440 Nm) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden Commodore. 2008 BMW X5 has automatic transmission and 2009 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2009 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 BMW X5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 BMW X5 | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | X5 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4398 cc | 5976 cc |
| Horse Power | 328 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 440 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
