2008 BMW X5 vs. 2011 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2011 Kia Cee'd is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,619 cc, 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 905 kg more than 2011 Kia Cee'd.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Kia Cee'd. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (480 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Kia Cee'd. (154 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Kia Cee'd.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 2011 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | BMW | Kia |
Model | X5 | Cee'd |
Year Released | 2008 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4619 cc | 1590 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 124 HP |
Torque | 480 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93.1 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85 mm | 85.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.5 seconds | 10.8 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 93 L | 53 L |