2008 BMW X5 vs. 2012 Chrysler Voyager
To start off, 2012 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 BMW X5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 BMW X5 would be higher. At 4,398 cc, 2008 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW X5 weights approximately 81 kg more than 2012 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 2008 BMW X5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 BMW X5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW X5 (440 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chrysler Voyager. (352 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 BMW X5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW X5 | 2012 Chrysler Voyager | |
Make | BMW | Chrysler |
Model | X5 | Voyager |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4398 cc | 3604 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 283 HP |
Torque | 440 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2191 kg | 2110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5151 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1725 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3078 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 85 L | 76 L |