2008 BMW Z4 vs. 1962 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2008 BMW Z4 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 BMW Z4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW Z4 weights approximately 695 kg more than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW Z4 (250 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 DAF Daffodil. (53 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2008 BMW Z4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 DAF Daffodil.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW Z4 | 1962 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | BMW | DAF |
Model | Z4 | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 26 HP |
Torque | 250 Nm | 53 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 85.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78.8 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 7.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 240 km/hour | 105 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1310 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 33 L |