2008 BMW Z4 vs. 1965 Jaguar MK X
To start off, 2008 BMW Z4 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 600 kg more than 2008 BMW Z4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW Z4. (315 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1965 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW Z4.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW Z4 | 1965 Jaguar MK X | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | Z4 | MK X |
Year Released | 2008 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 3781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
Torque | 315 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 1890 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.3 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 63 L |