2008 BMW Z4 vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 2008 BMW Z4 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 BMW Z4 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 BMW Z4 weights approximately 472 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Because 2008 BMW Z4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 BMW Z4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW Z4 (250 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 BMW Z4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW Z4 | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | BMW | Riley |
Model | Z4 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 250 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 888 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1310 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 25 L |