2008 BMW Z4 vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2008 BMW Z4 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Jaguar XJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Jaguar XJ would be higher. At 5,993 cc (12 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ (318 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2008 BMW Z4. (261 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 2008 BMW Z4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ (464 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 BMW Z4. (316 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 BMW Z4.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW Z4 | 1993 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | Z4 | XJ |
Year Released | 2008 | 1993 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2996 cc | 5993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 261 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 316 Nm | 464 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 78.5 mm |
Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 4990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1270 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 90 L |