2008 BMW Z4 vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2008 BMW Z4 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,246 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 BMW Z4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 BMW Z4 (338 HP @ 7900 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 BMW Z4 should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 BMW Z4 | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | BMW | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Z4 | FTO |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3246 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 338 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 7900 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 91 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 5 seconds | 6.5 seconds |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.1 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
