2008 BMW Z4 vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 BMW Z4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 BMW Z4 would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2008 BMW Z4. (215 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2008 BMW Z4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 BMW Z4 (250 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2008 BMW Z4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore. 2008 BMW Z4 has automatic transmission and 2012 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2012 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 BMW Z4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 BMW Z4 | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | Z4 | Commodore |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 250 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.5 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |