2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1941 Volvo PV
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Volvo PV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Volvo PV would be higher. At 3,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1941 Volvo PV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1941 Volvo PV. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1941 Volvo PV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 70 kg more than 1941 Volvo PV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1941 Volvo PV. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac CTS | 1941 Volvo PV | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | CTS | PV |
Year Released | 2008 | 1941 |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3668 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1490 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2880 mm |