2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1954 DKW F 89
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (263 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1954 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1954 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 928 kg more than 1954 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac CTS | 1954 DKW F 89 | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | CTS | F 89 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 684 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2360 mm |