2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1962 Ford Taunus
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1962 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 943 kg more than 1962 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac CTS | 1962 Ford Taunus | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | CTS | Taunus |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1183 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 845 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2530 mm |