2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1963 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2008 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2008 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 302 kg more than 2008 Cadillac CTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac CTS | 1963 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | CTS | 62 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.2 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 98.4 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5680 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3300 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 79 L |
