2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1963 Maserati 151
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Maserati 151. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Maserati 151 would be higher. At 4,941 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Maserati 151 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Maserati 151 (425 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 2008 Cadillac CTS. (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Maserati 151 should accelerate faster than 2008 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 930 kg more than 1963 Maserati 151.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac CTS | 1963 Maserati 151 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
| Model | CTS | 151 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 3175 cc | 4941 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 425 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2310 mm |
