2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 709 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac CTS (374 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2008 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac CTS | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | CTS | Cedric |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 307 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 374 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1794 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2540 mm |