2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 593 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac CTS (233 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac CTS | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
Model | CTS | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 233 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.2 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 95 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2700 mm |