2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1967 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (263 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1967 Ford Fairlane. (141 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 384 kg more than 1967 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac CTS | 1967 Ford Fairlane | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | CTS | Fairlane |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 141 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1404 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2960 mm |
