2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1967 Isuzu Bellett
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Isuzu Bellett. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Isuzu Bellett would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1967 Isuzu Bellett. (76 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1967 Isuzu Bellett. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 814 kg more than 1967 Isuzu Bellett. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac CTS (374 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Isuzu Bellett. (114 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2008 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Isuzu Bellett.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac CTS | 1967 Isuzu Bellett | |
| Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
| Model | CTS | Bellett |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1471 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 307 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 374 Nm | 114 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.6 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 8.7:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1794 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4040 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2360 mm |
