2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 6,550 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (263 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (213 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 203 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac CTS | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | CTS | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2008 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 6550 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 213 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2960 mm |