2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1973 Citroen Ami
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (263 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1973 Citroen Ami. (53 HP @ 6750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1973 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1033 kg more than 1973 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac CTS | 1973 Citroen Ami | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | CTS | Ami |
Year Released | 2008 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1015 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6750 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 755 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2410 mm |