2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1973 DAF 66
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 DAF 66 would be higher. At 5,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (395 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 339 more horse power than 1973 DAF 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1973 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 905 kg more than 1973 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 437 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 DAF 66. (99 Nm). This means 2008 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac CTS | 1973 DAF 66 | |
Make | Cadillac | DAF |
Model | CTS | 66 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5664 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 395 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 99 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 73.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2260 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 32 L |