2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1973 DAF 66
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 DAF 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 DAF 66 would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1973 DAF 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1973 DAF 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 950 kg more than 1973 DAF 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm) has 201 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 DAF 66. (99 Nm). This means 2008 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 DAF 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac CTS | 1973 DAF 66 | |
| Make | Cadillac | DAF |
| Model | CTS | 66 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3175 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 300 Nm | 99 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 840 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 32 L |
