2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1977 Rover 3500
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Rover 3500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Rover 3500 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1977 Rover 3500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (210 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1977 Rover 3500. (157 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1977 Rover 3500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 188 kg more than 1977 Rover 3500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1977 Rover 3500. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac CTS | 1977 Rover 3500 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Rover |
| Model | CTS | 3500 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 3532 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 157 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.9 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 74.7 mm | 71.1 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1372 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2820 mm |
