2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (263 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1978 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1978 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 968 kg more than 1978 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac CTS | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | CTS | 66 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 263 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1390 mm |