2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (210 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. (116 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 565 kg more than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Matra-Simca Murena. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac CTS | 1982 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Cadillac | Matra-Simca |
Model | CTS | Murena |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 2156 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 116 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2440 mm |