2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Mazda 929
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 410 kg more than 1982 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac CTS (263 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 2008 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac CTS | 1982 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | CTS | 929 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 210 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 263 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2620 mm |
