2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (307 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (72 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 929 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac CTS (374 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Renault 9. (104 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Renault 9.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac CTS | 1982 Renault 9 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Renault |
| Model | CTS | 9 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3564 cc | 1397 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 307 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 374 Nm | 104 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 5200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 76.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.6 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 11.3:1 | 9.2:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1794 kg | 865 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2490 mm |
