2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1987 Acura Integra
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Acura Integra would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (210 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1987 Acura Integra. (113 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1987 Acura Integra.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1987 Acura Integra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1987 Acura Integra has automatic transmission and 2008 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2008 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1987 Acura Integra will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac CTS | 1987 Acura Integra | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | CTS | Integra |
Year Released | 2008 | 1987 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2792 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 210 HP | 113 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4355 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1665 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2520 mm |