2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1987 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 3,175 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (215 HP) has 155 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Nissan Pulsar, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 2008 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Cadillac CTS | 1987 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | CTS | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2008 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3175 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 102 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2440 mm |