2008 Cadillac CTS vs. 1992 Acura Integra
To start off, 2008 Cadillac CTS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Acura Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Acura Integra would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Cadillac CTS (263 HP) has 125 more horse power than 1992 Acura Integra. (138 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1992 Acura Integra.
Because 2008 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Cadillac CTS (343 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Acura Integra. (163 Nm). This means 2008 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Acura Integra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Cadillac CTS | 1992 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Cadillac | Acura |
| Model | CTS | Integra |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1992 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 1799 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 263 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 343 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2560 mm |
